The recent inauguration of the U.SPresident has stirred the waters of Wall Street, igniting speculation on whether sweeping tariffs will materialize against geopolitical allies and rivals alikeDespite a cautious start in market reactions, the unpredictable waves of government policy—marked by delays, exemptions, and combative rhetoric—have begun to reshape investor sentimentThe question now looms: where do investors turn in this tumultuous landscape?

Up until this juncture, many investors appeared to take these market noises in stride, continuing to purchase stocks with a zeal that has kept the momentum aliveThe President's announcement of a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports set to roll out in March, alongside expectations of reciprocal tariffs in April targeting numerous trade partners, has not translated into the anticipated market downturnInstead, indices have risen, with the S&P 500 hovering near its historical peaksYet, this optimistic trajectory raises a critical inquiry: Are these enthusiastic buyers misjudging the gravity of the potential actions to come, or are they naively brushing aside looming risks?

Andrew Slimon, a portfolio manager at Morgan Stanley, posits that investors are recognizing that these tariffs may not be as intense as initially feared, which he deems a positive developmentHowever, he also emphasizes a contrasting sentiment—that underlying market frustrations hint at a lingering apprehension among investors regarding the myriad risks associated with government policiesHe highlighted that a considerable portion of recent equity market inflows has sprung from less robust shareholders who are perhaps more sensitive to market shocks, and as such, the market is responding increasingly to headline newsThe uncertainty surrounding trade policies has surged to levels not seen since 2019, during which a similar trade dispute loomed ominously.

Adam Turnquist, Chief Technical Strategist at LPL Financial, remarked on the synchronization of the uncertainty index and implicit market volatility, suggesting that this relationship indicates a potential uptick in market volatility ahead

Advertisements

Although expectations suggest volatility may increase in the medium term, the investor community seems ill-prepared to brace for such shifts.

Recent data from the U.SCommodity Futures Trading Commission reveals that hedge funds and other major speculators have maintained an ongoing net short position in futures linked to the Chicago Board Options Exchange's volatility index (VIX) for 16 consecutive weeksTheir net short positions now hover around 59,000 contracts—a level reminiscent of July 2023, when traders were caught unawares as the VIX soared to pandemic-era peaks, leading to a concurrent plunge in the S&P 500 index.

Turnquist indicates that under circumstances of high uncertainty and volatility, it becomes improbable for the market to maintain an unbroken ascent to record levelsThis casts doubt on prevailing optimistic predictions that the S&P 500 could achieve a 12% increase this year.

Adding to the conversation, Bill Sterling, a global strategist at GW&K Investment Management, expressed that tariffs embody one of the most significant risks for financial markets, referring to them as 'known unknowns'—even though the eventual scale, scope, and sequence remain clouded in ambiguityHe suggested that a reduction in noise and an increase in policy transparency would benefit the market immensely.

Goldman Sachs strategists echoed this sentiment, cautioning that tariffs represent a primary downside risk to their outlook for 2025. Noting the growing concern regarding unclear policies, Evercore ISI highlighted that market sentiment has already begun to shiftA Bank of America analysis reflected that the stock vulnerability of the largest 50 S&P 500 companies is approaching its highest levels in over 30 years.

Turnquist also forecasted that potential further tariffs and retaliation measures, coupled with governmental spending constraints, may challenge the sustainability of the tax cuts implemented by the previous administration

Advertisements

Accordingly, projections indicate modest stock market growth for the remainder of the year, with heightened volatility anticipated in comparison to 2024.

As the financial sector navigates its way through the current earnings season, American companies have expressed caution regarding the ramifications of trade tensionsFord Motor Company recently announced a delay in the imposition of 25% tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada, now slated for March 4. This decision stands to significantly impact the U.S. auto industryThe President disclosed intentions to unveil further automotive tariff measures around April 2.

Lori Calvasina, a strategist at RBC Capital Markets, has pointed out a valuable lesson from the S&P 500’s brief decline prior to the delay in tariffs on Mexico and Canada: the U.S. stock market is resilient, demonstrating patience and a tendency to avoid overreactions; however, it lacks significant capacity to absorb negative news.

On February 3, the very day the President announced tariffs against neighboring nations, the benchmark index plummeted nearly 2% in morning tradingYet, once the postponement of the tariffs was confirmed, the index clawed back a considerable portion of its earlier losses.

Market resilience may also be more illusion than reality; for instance, after the President’s Thursday declaration of intent to impose reciprocal tariffs, the S&P 500 index closed 1% up largely due to investor relief that no tariffs were implemented that day—hoping for a lengthier delayNotably, over 40% of this surge was solely attributable to three companies: Nvidia, Apple, and TeslaThis observation strikes at the heart of the current risks operant within the stock market.

Top-tier technology firms have propelled the U.S. stock market’s lofty ascent in recent years, and with the burgeoning of artificial intelligence technologies, the gap between these firms and other sectors has widenedConversely, this meteoric rise has led these same stocks to appear vulnerable, revealing signs of overvaluation, amid growing apprehensions regarding Chinese AI startup DeepSeek.

Scott Rubner, a tactical expert with Goldman Sachs, contended that the market’s capacity for opportunistic purchases may be diminishing, emphasizing that the prevailing trend is 'everyone is buying.' The consistent activity of major tech firms in reinforcing positions after market dips raises systemic risks; any waning confidence in this grouping could have cascading effects across the broader market.

Nevertheless, Wall Street has not entirely turned a blind eye to the risks posed by tariffs

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements